Compounding Offer Audit: five rules and a five-check script (free sample)
by PaperChaseWebb
From the Compounding Offer Audit: five rules for scoring an offer on six tests (one owner, six scores and no total, a fact for every score, no 3 on say-so, one change on the weakest test), and a read-only script that checks one small file for them.
- Price
- Free
- Difficulty
- Beginner
- Setup
- 5 min
- Format
- .md file
compounding-offer-audit-five-rules-and-checks-free-sample.md · 9 KB · direct download, no signup
What you end up with
In a few minutes you can see whether an offer's scores rest on facts, which test is weakest, and whether your next step is aimed at it.
What you get
- Five audit rules
- offer_mini.py: five read-only checks on one offer-lite.json
- One prompt for all four harnesses
- Worked example: 5 findings, then 0
Who it is for
Anyone who sells more than one thing and wants a quick, honest look at which one to fix first.
Works with
Solid chips: the agent is named in this listing's own tools list. Dashed chip: Plain Markdown, so it also pastes into other agents such as Grok Bot, Hermes, OpenClaw or Muse. We list those as compatible by format only, not as tested.
Tools needed
Cost to run: Free.
Time to result: About fifteen minutes to a first scored offer
Sample prompts, free to use
Score my offer [name] on six tests from 0 to 3: recurring, productized, systemized, owned, compounding, and whether doubling it would make my week better. Use only my invoices, my calendar and our written procedures. Give one sentence of evidence per test and where it came from. Write unknown where you do not have the fact, and tell me what is missing. Do not give a 3 on anything I only told you. Do not add the scores up. Then name the weakest test and propose one change for it, with how I will know it worked. Put it in offer-lite.json and run offer_mini.py offer-lite.json.
The rules and the script are in the file.
Free preview of the file
# Compounding Offer Audit: five rules and a five-check script (free sample)
Version 1.0, 2026-10-29. By PaperChaseWebb. For owners of small service businesses who sell more than one thing and want to know which one to fix first. One Markdown file and one Python 3 script, standard library only. The script was tested on its worked example (5 findings, then 0) and on a missing file (exit 2). It was not run inside any agent harness or on a real business.
Most offer audits end in a total out of 100. A total hides the one thing that will hurt: an offer that only the owner can deliver, or a line where one client pays most of the bills. And most are scored from memory, which is how every offer ends up looking fine. This sample scores one offer on six tests, from 0 to 3: recurring, productized, systemized, owned, compounding, and whether growing it would make the owner's week better. Each score needs a fact. Then it names the weakest test and asks for one change. The life test (if this line doubled, would the owner's week get better or worse?) comes from a post by Pascio, credited in the full pack.
## Install in one line
Save this page as FREE-SAMPLE.md, then:
```
python3 -c "import re;t=open('FREE-SAMPLE.md').read();open('offer_mini.py','w').write(re.search(r'~~~python\n(.*?)~~~',t,re.S).group(1))"
python3 offer_mini.py offer-lite.json
```
## Five rules
1. **One owner.** One person says yes to changes. Everyone else, agents included, proposes.
2. **Six scores, no total.** ScorTest record
- Date
- Oct 29, 2026
- What was run
- offer_mini.py on the worked example, a fixed file and a missing file.
- Result
- 5 findings, then 0; exit 2 on a missing file.
- Not run
- The prompt inside a harness. A real business.
Copied from this item's dated test notes. What was not run stays in.
Worth knowing
- The sample checks one file against five rules. The written 0 to 3 scales, the worksheet, actions per kind of low score, the life veto as a gate, audits kept over time, owner approvals by hash and the fifteen checks are in the full pack.
- On 2026-10-29 offer_mini.py gave 5 findings on the worked example, then 0 on the fixed file, and exited 2 on a missing file. The prompt was not run inside a harness and the audit was not run on a real business.
Questions
Does it send anything anywhere?
No. It reads one file and opens no network connection.
What is in the full pack?
A written 0 to 3 scale for each test, a worksheet, the audit folder with templates, offer.py with a gate for agents, a one-page audit and owner approvals tied to a hash with one use and expiry, fifteen read-only checks with a seeded test audit, a skill file, AGENTS.md snippet and Grok Bot rules block, ten prompts and a failure table. $19.
Details
Version 1.0 · Updated Oct 29, 2026 · Markdown version of this page
License: Personal and commercial use. Download terms
Related
Compounding Offer Audit: score an offer on six tests, find its weakest point, change one thing
Score each thing you sell from 0 to 3 on six tests: recurring, productized, systemized, owned demand, compounding, and whether growing it would make the owner's week better. Every score needs a checkable fact and its source, or the word unknown and the fact you are missing; no 3 on the owner's say-so, and no total. The audit names the weakest test, treats a low life score as a veto on growth, and proposes one change with a success test and a date. Every change waits for the owner's yes. Fifteen read-only checks run on the folder.
The absorption test: seven scores for any AI product idea (free sample)
The quick platform test, the seven-line absorption test with a reading guide, the nine-area demo gap list, three rules to paste and a check prompt.
Problem Mining Loop: five rules and a five-check script (free sample)
From the Problem Mining Loop: five rules for a complaint log you can trust (one owner and one buyer type, a link and date on every complaint, quote never paraphrase, money shown not guessed, count people not posts), and a read-only script that checks one log for them.
Agent Readiness Self-Check: score one workflow before you hand it to an AI agent
A free self-check for agencies and small businesses. Name the decision, then score one workflow across eight areas (workflow mapped, data access, approval gates, owner per agent, handoffs, cost tracking, security and vetting, measurement) with an evidence rule, three gate rules and a skeptical pass, and read your band and the next steps it allows. v1.1 starts with the decision the score will change, scores unknowns as unknown, adds rules for conflicting facts and lookalike public records, ties every band to the next steps it allows with the Production Readiness Audit before go-live, makes owner approval concrete (prepared and approved status, a one-reply approval line, decisions the agent must leave open, a done test), adds agent files for Grok Bot, Claude Code, Codex and Hermes, a second worked example (missed call to booked job), a readiness folder with a fifteen-check read-only checker, a front door test with four questions to ask anyone selling you an agent install, and a plain note on how it was tested. Still free.
Startup Credits Sweep: five rules and a five-check script (free sample)
From the Startup Credits Sweep: five rules for going after startup credits honestly (facts first, the program's own dated page, apply only when every requirement is met, answers say your facts word for word, count credits only after approval and set a reminder before expiry), and a read-only script that checks one small file for them.